Different Worlds: Unacknowledged Special Operations and Covert Action

Abstract

The ability for the United States to employ special operations forces in denied areas, on secret, unacknowledged missions, is critical to our success in the current war and in future conflict. In the area of covert operations, there is an ongoing debate about the blurred operational lines between DoD-led "Title 10 operations" versus CIA-led "Title 50 operations." This paper will examine the statutory and doctrinal definitions of covert action, to include the "traditional military activities" exception to the law; the legal requirements for using covert action as defined in law; and the policy issues surrounding the use of covert action. Under the law, special operations forces conducting missions where the role of the U.S. is unacknowledged are not conducting "covert action" within the meaning of the law, as long as those missions are under the command and control of a military commander in support of ongoing or anticipated hostilities ("Title 10 operations").

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 24, 2009
Accession Number
ADA494716

Entities

People

  • Richard C. Gross

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Energy and Power Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Asymmetric Warfare
  • Command And Control
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Department Of Defense
  • Economic Sanctions
  • Employment
  • Foreign Policy
  • International Law
  • Military Science
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Unconventional Warfare
  • United States
  • United States Government
  • United States Special Operations Command
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Government and Public Administration Law.
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Strategic Security Studies

Technology Areas

  • Fully Networked C3
  • Fully Networked C3 - Command and Control