Defense Acquisitions. Key Considerations for Planning Future Army Combat Systems

Abstract

The Future Combat System (FCS) program--which comprises 14 integrated weapon systems and an advanced information network--is the centerpiece of the Army's effort to transition to a lighter, more agile, and more capable combat force. The substantial technical challenges, the cost of the program, and the Army's acquisition strategy are among the reasons why the program is recognized as needing special oversight and review. This testimony is based on GAO's March 12, 2009 report and addresses knowledge gaps that will persist in the FCS program as Congress is asked to make significant funding commitments for development and production over the next several years. In its March 2009 report, GAO suggested Congress consider not approving full funds for the program until several conditions are met, such as preparation of a complete budget for any program emerging from the milestone review. GAO also recommends the Secretary of Defense, among other things, ensure the program that emerges conforms to current defense acquisition policy, such as technology maturity; any spin out approach is based on fully tested results; and any incremental strategy involves free standing, justifiable increments.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 26, 2009
Accession Number
ADA495692

Entities

People

  • Paul L. Francis

Organizations

  • United States Government Accountability Office

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Cyber
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accountability
  • Acquisition
  • Congress
  • Cost Estimates
  • Costs
  • Electronic Mail
  • Governments
  • Ground Vehicles
  • House Of Representatives
  • Line Of Sight
  • Military Acquisition
  • Military Capabilities
  • Military Operations
  • United States Government
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
  • Vehicles
  • Websites

Readers

  • Defense Acquisition Program Management
  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis
  • Naval Mine Countermeasure Systems Development.