Defense Acquisitions. Measuring the Value of DOD's Weapon Programs Requires Starting with Realistic Baselines

Abstract

We have conducted a body of work that examines weapon acquisition issues from a perspective that draws upon lessons learned from best practices in product development. Collectively, these practices comprise a process that is anchored in knowledge. Achieving the right knowledge at the right time enables leadership to make informed decisions about when and how best to move into various expensive acquisition phases. In essence, knowledge supplants risk over time. This building of knowledge consists of gathering information about technology, design, and manufacturing at three critical points over the course of a weapon system program (Figure 1). We have developed valuable "knowledge metrics" that measure this knowledge build and allow us to identify potential problems that could lead to cost, schedule, or performance shortfalls and their likely causes. The metrics can be described as "Knowledge" Metrics Identify Potential Problems and Their Likely Causes Knowledge Point 1, evidenced by the balance between a product's required capabilities and the resources available to meet them. Focus should be on understanding technological and design implications and achieving a high level of technology maturity at the start of system development. This means that the critical technologies needed to meet essential product requirements must be demonstrated to work in theirs intended environment. The technology readiness level for each critical technology is the metric we use to measure technology maturity. Knowledge point 2, evidenced by the development of engineering prototypes and the completion of engineering drawings for an integrated product at the system design review. This metric provides tangible evidence that the product's design is stable, meaning it has a high probability of meeting customer requirements, as well as cost, schedule, and reliability targets.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 2009
Accession Number
ADA497995

Entities

People

  • Bruce Fairbairn
  • Cheryl Andrew
  • John Oppenheim
  • Michael J. Sullivan
  • Ridge Bowman
  • Ron Schwenn
  • Susan Neill

Organizations

  • United States Government Accountability Office

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Aircrafts
  • Best Practices
  • Commerce
  • Congress
  • Engineering
  • Engineering Drawings
  • Fighter Aircraft
  • Governments
  • Military Acquisition
  • Procurement
  • Product Development
  • Reliability
  • Systems Engineering
  • Test And Evaluation
  • United States
  • United States Government

Fields of Study

  • Computer science

Readers

  • Defense Acquisition Program Management
  • Software Engineering.
  • Systems Analysis and Design