Redefining the US Approach to Reconstruction and Stability Operations

Abstract

This paper examines the United States Government?s (USG) current National Security Presidential Directive (NSPD 44) policy that drives reconstruction and stability (R&S) operations, and whether the USG has postured its legislative procedures and governmental agencies to support this policy. The current operational environment dictates how the USG will structure capability and expand capacity to successfully meet the strategic challenges. The United States' history is full of great examples of conducting R&S operations; however, the looming 21st Century challenges will demand a "Whole-of Government" approach to R&S operations. By focusing the USG national level approach to these operations, a better legislative approach will emerge. A new NSPD that is supported by statutory reforms that do not restrict the civilian and military capacity is paramount. The Departments of State (DOS) and Defense are the most important agencies in implementing this national directive. It is incumbent that clear delineated lines and authorities are granted to both agencies to facilitate a coherent national policy. The U.S. Army and DOS will need to reform some of its structure, policy, doctrine and training to better support the nation in R&S operations.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 02, 2009
Accession Number
ADA498111

Entities

People

  • Timothy L. Faulkner

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Counter WMD
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Congress
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Department Of State
  • Doctrine
  • Education
  • Failed States
  • Governments
  • Law
  • Military History
  • Military Operations
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Personnel Management
  • Students
  • United States
  • United States Government
  • War Colleges

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Strategic Security Studies