Attaining Stability: A Case for Accepting a Nuclearized Iran
Abstract
Iran is currently viewed by the United States as a source of instability within the Middle East. The recent emergence of a more strident Iranian government, apparently pursuing the acquisition of nuclear weapons, has further destabilized the fragile regional environment. The prospect of a nuclear-capable Iran poses a profound threat for both the balance of power in the region and the security of Israel. This paper examines the social-economic-political context driving Iran towards nuclear armament and objectively examines corresponding policy alternatives for the United States, Pakistan, and other regional actors. It specifically assesses the regional implications of aggressive counterproliferation actions by the United States or Israel and contrasts those with the near- and long-term consequences of accepting a nuclear-capable Iran. The paper concludes by recommending that the United States focus its efforts on regional development and deterrence vice military counterproliferation measures by establishing democratic and liberalized governments in the region. The goals of the strategy would be to surround Iran with successful liberal governments that would influence it towards moderation, deter Iran's use of acquired nuclear weapons, reduce and contain its support of terrorism, and limit the regional impact of its nuclear capabilities.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Feb 11, 2009
- Accession Number
- ADA500599
Entities
People
- Naushad Kayani
Organizations
- United States Army War College