Public Reporting and a More Sustainable Army

Abstract

The United States Army has embraced the goal of incorporating sustainability into its operations, all the while meeting its primary mission to defend the United States. The Army also has indicated a desire to be both transparent and accountable, so it has adopted a recognizable reporting framework - as outlined by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). This review considers the Army's response to the GRI framework in its recent sustainability report, and points out opportunities to strengthen both. It also makes recommendations to improve the Army's reporting and goal-setting efforts by making them more meaningful and more measurable. Such changes are necessary to achieve full sustainability, especially given the many challenges facing an organization as large and diverse as the Army. While making these changes, progress must be communicated to both internal and external audiences ? especially the general public ? in clear and substantive terms. This report further outlines how Army personnel can become leaders in global sustainability reporting and suggests that numerous benefits will result from setting well-articulated, appropriately scaled goals and tracking progress toward those goals over time.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 2009
Accession Number
ADA500705

Entities

People

  • Chris C. Rewerts
  • David A. Krooks
  • Gary L. Gerdes
  • Michelle J. Hanson
  • Stuart D. Foltz

Organizations

  • Engineer Research and Development Center

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Ground and Sea Platforms

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Army Personnel
  • Business Administration
  • Commerce
  • Department Of Defense
  • Dielectric Gases
  • Energy Consumption
  • Energy Management
  • Environment
  • Environmental Protection
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Gases
  • Greenhouse Effect
  • Greenhouse Gases
  • Information Systems
  • Natural Gas
  • Natural Resources
  • United States

Readers

  • Economics
  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.
  • Systems Analysis and Design