Classification of Schedule Management Barriers through Concept Mapping

Abstract

Barriers to the adoption of schedule management processes are a matter of serious concern to the acquisition community. Schedule management has been widely accepted to contribute to the successful execution of complicated system development processes since the 1950s. However, studies of recent acquisition failures illustrate that over the last 15 years, there has been significant internal resistance to the adoption of schedule management processes. This exploratory effort used concept mapping to identify and classify the types of barriers existing in the Aeronautical Systems Center (ASC). A series of open-ended questions were posed to four experienced program managers in ASC. Units of Analysis were extracted from the survey responses and grouped and sorted by a representative set of proxy sorters. Multidimensional scaling was applied to the sorted groups to identify the affinity of the responses, and cluster analysis was employed to identify emerging themes from the program managers' responses. The results indicated 10 barrier groups that can be mapped using two conceptual axes (internal-external and tactical-strategic). As a result of this analysis, focused recommendations are provided to the ASC Acquisition Center of Excellence to improve acceptance and adoption of schedule management practices.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 26, 2009
Accession Number
ADA502458

Entities

People

  • Gregory W. Voth

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Air Force
  • Air Force Facilities
  • Business Administration
  • Classification
  • Computer Programs
  • Computers
  • Department Of Defense
  • Engineering
  • Engineers
  • Gantt Charts
  • Literature Surveys
  • Project Management
  • Spreadsheet Software
  • System Of Systems
  • Systems Engineering
  • Test And Evaluation

Readers

  • Defense Acquisition Program Management
  • Organizational Psychology.
  • Systems Analysis and Design