Evaluation of Commercial and Field-Expedient Baited Traps for House Flies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)

Abstract

A comparison of nine commercial baited fly traps on Florida dairy farms demonstrated that Terminator traps collected significantly more (13,323/trap) house flies (Musca domestica L.) than the others tested. Final Flight, Fly Magnet, and FliesBeGone traps collected intermediate numbers of flies (834-2,166), and relatively few were caught with ISCA, Advantage, Fermone Big Boy, Squeeze & Snap, or OakStump traps (<300). Terminator traps collected about twice as many flies (799.8/trap) as FliesBeGone traps (343.8) when each trap was baited with its respective attractant, but when the attractants were switched between the two trap types, collections were significantly lower (77-108) than was observed with traps baited with their respective attractant. Solutions of molasses were significantly more attractive to house flies than honey, maple syrup, or jaggery (date palm sugar). Field-expedient traps constructed from discarded PET water bottles were much less effective than commercial traps, but painting the tops of such traps with black spray paint resulted in a six-fold increase in trap capture.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 09, 2009
Accession Number
ADA503299

Entities

People

  • Christopher J. Geden
  • Daniel E. Szumlas
  • Todd W. Walker

Organizations

  • Agricultural Research Service

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Biological Products
  • Communicable Disease Control
  • Consumers
  • Disease Vectors
  • Engineering
  • Entomology
  • Food
  • Instructions
  • Lepidoptera
  • Materials
  • Medical Personnel
  • Military Operations
  • Naval Air Stations
  • Pest Control
  • Pheromones
  • Test And Evaluation

Fields of Study

  • Agricultural and Food sciences

Readers

  • Vector-Borne Disease and Entomology