Laboratory and Field Evaluation of SS220 and Deet Against Mosquitoes in Queensland, Australia

Abstract

Laboratory and field efficacy trials comparing deet (N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide) and SS220 [(1S, 2'S)-2-methylpiperindinyl-3-cyclohexen-1-carboxamide] against mosquitoes in Queensland, Australia, were conducted. In the laboratory, both compounds provided between 150 and 195 min of protection against Aedes aegypti and between 18 and 80 min of protection against Anopheles farauti. In laboratory tests against Culex annulirostris, 20% SS220 provided 3 h of protection and 20% deet provided >6 h of protection. A field efficacy test was conducted at Redcliffe, Queensland in January 2008 and the predominant mosquito species collected was Cx. annulirostris (84.4% of collection). In the field, 20% SS220 provided significantly better protection against mosquitoes than 20% deet. Seven hours after application, SS220 provided greater than 96.0% protection against all mosquitoes, whereas 20% deet provided 58.9% protection.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2009
Accession Number
ADA504069

Entities

People

  • Donna O. Mackenzie
  • Jerome A. Klun
  • Mustapha Debboun
  • Stephen P. Frances

Organizations

  • Army Medical Department

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Agriculture
  • Australia
  • Bioremediation
  • Environmental Protection
  • Environmental Restoration And Remediation
  • Field Tests
  • Health
  • Insect Repellents
  • Laboratory Tests
  • New Guinea
  • Pesticides
  • Research Facilities
  • Standards
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Ticks
  • United States

Readers

  • Aerospace Test and Evaluation
  • Vector-Borne Disease and Entomology