Understanding the Physiological, Biomechanical, and Performance Effects of Body Armor Use

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the effects on Soldiers' physiological, biomechanical, and maximal performance responses of not wearing any armor, wearing an armor vest, and wearing a vest plus extremity armor. Eleven Army enlisted men participated in the study. Participants carried out the following activities on separate days of testing: walking (1.39 m/s); running (2.34 m/s); and three maximal effort tasks. The maximal effort tasks were: five continuous 30-m rushes; 5 min of repetitive lifting of a 20.5-kg. box; and obstacle course runs. The walking and the running trials were 10 min in duration and took place on a level treadmill. Each participant was tested in five conditions: no armor, the Interceptor Body Armor tactical vest, and three types of extremity armor, which were work with the armor vest. The vest was configured with a collar, groin protector, and protective inserts. The three designs of extremity armor were similar in weight, but varied in body surface area covered.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 2008
Accession Number
ADA504354

Entities

People

  • Brian Corner
  • Carolyn K. Bensel
  • Jeffrey M. Schiffman
  • Karen N. Gregorczyk
  • Leif Hasselquist

Organizations

  • United States Army Soldier Systems Center

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Afghanistan Conflict
  • Area Coverage
  • Biomechanics
  • Body Armor
  • Clothing
  • Data Analysis
  • Iraqi-War
  • Lower Extremity
  • Materials
  • Performance Tests
  • Physical Activity
  • Physiology
  • Three Dimensional
  • Treadmills
  • Upper Extremity
  • Volunteers

Readers

  • Exercise and Sports Science.
  • Materials Science