Sustaining Competitive Advantage: Mental Models and Organizational Learning for Future Marines

Abstract

Napoleon shocked the Prussians at Jena. The Prussian generals could not conceive of an entity capable of defeating the system designed by Frederick the Great. Wedded to a scheme that brought them past successes, the Prussians were unable to see the new conditions confronting them. The Prussians never fully recognized the true extent of the mental rigidity and deterioration afflicting the generals until that October afternoon in 1806, at Jena and Auerstedt. The Prussian generals did not see what was happening in the world around them because their collective frame of mind would not allow new ideas to intrude. This historical example--and countless others like it--includes the elements of change and an inability to perceive change. In this case and many others, warfare changed in form to such a degree it triumphed over the preceding form, and the people involved believed their era witnessed the advent of rapid and fundamental conversion. Complexity theory says the people in each era were correct. Systems capable of the most complex, sophisticated responses will always have the edge in a competitive world. Warfare represents the ultimate in human competition, and as such, warfare will continually evolve in form toward increasing sophistication and complexity.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2007
Accession Number
ADA505425

Entities

People

  • W. H. Vivian

Organizations

  • Marine Corps University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Cognitive Science
  • Commerce
  • Control Systems
  • Doctrine
  • Education
  • Human Behavior
  • Instructors
  • Learning
  • Marine Corps
  • Military Education
  • New York
  • Psychology
  • Simulations
  • Thinking
  • Training
  • United States
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Economics
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.