Toward Affordable Systems: Portfolio Analysis and Management for Army Science and Technology Programs

Abstract

This plan calls for the consideration of the lifecycle cost of a system during its design and development stage. Studies have shown that on average, 85 percent of lifecycle cost decisions have been made by the end of technology development. This fact raises the concern that, after the S&T phase, one cannot change the basic design to significantly reduce a systems lifecycle cost, further emphasizing the need to consider lifecycle cost at an early stage. The current method used by the Army Deputy Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology to evaluate ATOs does not include lifecycle cost. Thus, the purpose of this study is to develop and demonstrate a method and a model that allow the consideration of lifecycle cost at an early stage of a systems development, so that timely corrective actions can be taken if lifecycle cost moves above an acceptable level. In addition to the incorporation of lifecycle cost, the method is aimed at alleviating the problem of summing or comparing "apples and oranges" that often occurs when ranking S&T projects. Typical schemes used in the Army S&T community for selecting or ranking S&T (or other) projects sum an individual project's contributions to meeting several different future capability requirements. This traditional approach to ranking runs the risk of having projects scored high and selected for continued funding, even though their high scores may all come from meeting the same FOC requirements. A portfolio of such highly ranked projects can leave the requirements unmet for the rest of the equally important FOCs. In addition to introducing a new method, the study also demonstrates how input parameters, including cost components, can be estimated. However, the Army S&T and acquisition community will very likely have much better data and can more easily and accurately make cost estimates.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2009
Accession Number
ADA508762

Entities

People

  • Brian G. Chow
  • Richard Silberglitt
  • Scott Hiromoto

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Sensors
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Aircrafts
  • Armored Personnel Carriers
  • Business Administration
  • Health Services
  • Hiv Infections
  • Information Systems
  • Iraqi-War
  • Management Personnel
  • Medical Personnel
  • Military Applications
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
  • Vaccines
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis
  • Military Science and Technology Research and Modernization.
  • Systems Analysis and Design