Cost Effective VV&A: Get Credit for What You're Already Doing

Abstract

The vast majority of software engineers are conscientious professionals who work hard to convince themselves that their software does the right thing and works correctly. But they almost never write down what they do so that they can convince someone else. The work they do is, in essence, verification and validation. Part of the problem is that developers often don't think of what they do as "V&V", they may or may not be focused on the M&S application requirements, and if it's not documented then they can't get credit for it, anyway. This paper describes a cost-effective VV&A approach centered on the capability, accuracy and usability of M&S. This approach focuses V&V activities on accreditation requirements by formalizing an intended use statement by the ultimate M&S user. The approach also facilitates making best use of activities that already are ongoing during the development of the software. We identify some useful tips for low cost informal documentation of V&V information required to support an accreditation.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2002
Accession Number
ADA510557

Entities

People

  • David H. Hall
  • Michelle L. Kilikauskas

Organizations

  • Naval Air Warfare Center

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Accuracy
  • Acquisition
  • Aerial Warfare
  • Configuration Management
  • Engineering
  • Engineers
  • Inertial Measurement Units
  • Instructions
  • Military Aircraft
  • Risk
  • Simulations
  • Simulators
  • Standards
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Validation
  • Verification

Fields of Study

  • Computer science

Readers

  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • STEM Education
  • Theoretical Analysis.