How to Fail at Post-Hostilities Planning at the Operational Level

Abstract

Combatant commander leadership is THE critical factor in ensuring robust, operational planning is done for post-hostilities (Phase IV). This can be seen by looking at the Phase IV failures in both Panama and Iraq. Both these Phase IV planning failures followed successful combat operations in Phase III, but the combatant commanders failed to ensure as much effort was put into Phase IV planning as Phase III. In fact, they failed to ensure there was any real plan at all. They failed to focus their staffs and produce an executable plan due to their decisions to separate the combat planners from the post-hostilities planners and OPSEC concerns that killed effective coordination between Phase III and IV. In addition, replacement of the commander of SOUTHCOM just months before Operation JUST CAUSE and the commander of CENTCOM in the months immediately following the conclusion of Phase III in Operation IRAQI FREEDOM exacerbated an already difficult and complex planning environment. Neither commander prepared an adequate plan for Phase IV and the results speak for themselves.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 23, 2009
Accession Number
ADA513944

Entities

People

  • Scott D. Chowning

Organizations

  • Naval War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Civil Affairs
  • Combat Operations
  • Combatant Commanders
  • Command And Control
  • Interagency Coordination
  • Iraqi-War
  • Military History
  • Military Operations
  • Military Organizations
  • New York
  • Operations Security
  • Technical Information Centers
  • Unified Combatant Commands
  • United States Southern Command
  • War
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Business Analytics
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.