The Gap Between Leadership Policy and Practice: A Historical Perspective

Abstract

In spite of the rapid socio-cultural evolution that has taken place in the United States since its birth as a nation, there has been consistency in US Army policy with respect to leadership. Modern research in the military and social sciences has confirmed the psychological and military validity of the leadership philosophy prescribed by current Army regulations as well as those dating back to the late 18th century. But military leaders have demonstrated a continuing propensity to behave in ways at variance both with policy and with the interests of the service. My purposes in this article are to review the fundamental themes stated in US Army leadership policy since 1778, and to illustrate how practice has regularly, and destructively, departed from them. I will then discuss how military socialization processes have guided new NCOs and officers into behavioral patterns that do not conform to policy, and suggest some ways in which these processes might be changed to bring leadership practice more nearly into consonance with policy.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 1990
Accession Number
ADA515376

Entities

People

  • Faris R. Kirkland

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Doctrine
  • Enlisted Personnel
  • International Organizations
  • Korean War
  • Language
  • Leadership
  • Military History
  • New York
  • Psychology
  • Recreation
  • Second World War
  • Social Sciences
  • Students
  • Training
  • United States
  • War
  • War Colleges

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.
  • Systems Analysis and Design