Scientific Resistance to Research, Training and Utilization of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy in Treating Post-War Disorders

Abstract

In this study, Barber's [(1961). Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery. Science, 134, 596-602] analysis of scientists' resistance to discoveries is examined in relation to an 18-year controversy between the dominant cognitive-behavioral paradigm or zeitgeist and its chief rival - eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) in treating trauma-related disorders. Reasons for persistent opposition to training, utilization and research into an identified 'evidence-based treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder' (EBTPTSD) within US military and veterans' agencies closely parallels Barber's description of resistance based upon socio-cultural factors and scientific bias versus genuine scientific skepticism. The implications of sustained resistance to EMDR for combat veterans and other trauma sufferers are discussed. A unified or super-ordinate goal is offered to reverse negative trends impacting current and future mental healthcare of military personnel, veterans and other trauma survivors, and to bridge the scientific impasse.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2008
Accession Number
ADA519179

Entities

People

  • Mark C. Russell

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Anxiety Disorders
  • Cognition
  • Department Of Veterans Affairs
  • Diseases And Disorders
  • Eye Movements
  • Health Services
  • Iraqi-War
  • Medical Personnel
  • Mental Health
  • Military Medicine
  • Psychiatry
  • Psychology
  • Psychotherapy
  • Social Sciences
  • Training
  • Traumatic Stress Disorder

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Canadian European Scientific Immigration and Epilepsy Clearance Studies
  • Mental Health of Military Veterans with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): Risk Factors, Prevalence, Symptoms, and Treatment.
  • Systems Analysis and Design