Strategic Planning for National Security: A New Project Solarium

Abstract

For a country that continues to enjoy an unrivaled global position, it is both remarkable and disturbing that the United States has no truly effective strategic planning process for national security. Fifteen years after the Cold War, the United States still lacks a comprehensive interagency process that takes into account both the character of the international security environment and its own ability to deal with future challenges and opportunities. Today, the United States is engaged in conflicts that will, whether by success or failure, completely transform both the broader Middle East and the U.S. role in the world; yet there is no integrated planning process from which to derive the strategic guidance necessary to protect national interests and achieve U.S. objectives. While the George W. Bush administration?s 2002 National Security Strategy of the United States of America did articulate a set of national goals and objectives, it was not the product of serious strategic planning. More than 4 years after September 11, 2001, there is no established interagency process for assessing the full spectrum of threats and opportunities endemic to the new security environment and identifying priorities for policy development, execution, and resource allocation. The articulation of a national vision that describes America?s purpose in the post?September 11 world is useful?indeed, it is vital?but describing a destination is no substitute for developing a comprehensive roadmap for how the country will achieve its stated goals. Various institutions in the national security apparatus have attempted strategic planning, but these efforts have been stovepiped within individual agencies and have varied in both approach and quality. There is still no systematic effort at strategic planning for national security that is inclusive, deliberative, and integrative.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2006
Accession Number
ADA521724

Entities

People

  • Michele A. Flournoy
  • Shawn W. Brimley

Organizations

  • National Defense University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Cold War
  • Crisis Management
  • Department Of Defense
  • Foreign Policy
  • Governments
  • Homeland Security
  • International Security
  • National Governments
  • National Security
  • New York
  • Organizational Structure
  • Political Science
  • President (United States)
  • Security
  • Two Dimensional
  • United States
  • War Colleges

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • Strategic Security Studies
  • Systems Analysis and Design