A Hedge Against Politicization: An Impartial Intelligence Community for America

Abstract

Today the National Intelligence Community (IC) is mired in a dilemma that challenges the credibility of our national policymaking process. Intelligence assessments inconsistent with policymaker political objectives have often been subjugated by partisan second guessing. Policymakers who tailor raw intelligence to fit their needs, coupled with intelligence leader's complicity have cast serious doubts on the intelligence community's analytical independence. The IC's failure to predict the 9/11 terrorist attacks and its inability to accurately determine the viability of Iraq's WMD program are not illustrations of ineptitude, but instead, an indictment of a deeply flawed system prone to manipulation and analytical gerrymandering. This paper will dissect the relationship and challenges that exist between the intelligence community and policymaker. It argues for an impartial intelligence enterprise free of analytical biases and preconceived partisan political dispositions. This paper proposes modeling the IC after the Federal Reserve or Congressional Budget Office in order to create a nonpartisan institution free to provide sound intelligence advice to policymakers based on unblemished analysis.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 2010
Accession Number
ADA521962

Entities

People

  • Bruce A. Stephens

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Engineered Resilient Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Case Studies
  • Communities
  • Department Of Defense
  • Department Of Homeland Security
  • Education
  • Foreign Relations
  • Governments
  • Intelligence Analysts
  • Intelligence Community
  • Intelligence Community (United States)
  • National Security
  • Organizational Structure
  • Security
  • Terrorists
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Weapons Of Mass Destruction

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Political Violence and Terrorism Studies.
  • Strategic Security Studies