Airpower and Psychological Denial

Abstract

According to RAND researcher Stephen Hosmer, the promise of airpower resides in "air operations against enemy deployed forces, the demoralization of which might cause enemy cohesion to disintegrate and battlefield resistance to collapse"--a concept here termed psychological denial. While airpower enthusiasts have advocated psychological effects since the days of Giulio Douhet, these effects have usually been seen in terms of targeting the public's will and then the leadership's ability to continue the fight. Airpower could thus enable strategists to leapfrog fielded forces and strike at the heart of the enemy. But that did not happen in Operation Iraqi Freedom. Carl Conetta states that the operation was the first example of airpower used to effect psychological denial. Is it true Iraqi Freedom was a unique use of joint and combined airpower, and did this strategy work?

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2005
Accession Number
ADA522873

Entities

People

  • Wesley P. Hallman

Organizations

  • National Defense University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Autonomy
  • C4I
  • Human Systems
  • Sensors
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aerial Warfare
  • Air Defense
  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Armored Vehicles
  • Bombing
  • Center Of Gravity
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Control Systems
  • Iraqi-War
  • Joint Military Activities
  • Military Force Levels
  • Military Operations
  • Military Organizations
  • National Security
  • Strategic Attack
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Economics
  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies