Soldier Performance on a New Marksmanship Course of Fire

Abstract

The research investigated a new course of fire, called combat field fire (CFF), to determine CFF marksmanship standards, and where CFF should occur in marksmanship training. CFF is a complex scenario requiring changing magazines, reacting to a simulated malfunction and engaging targets within arrays that require multiple hits. Ten training companies (1976 Soldiers) from the Infantry OSUT and Basic Combat Training Brigades at Ft. Benning, GA participated. Six companies executed Army qualification at the end of basic rifle marksmanship (BRM) and CFF at the end of advanced rifle marksmanship (ARM). Four executed CFF in BRM and executed Army qualification in ARM. Performance data and Soldier interviews revealed the unique dynamics of CFF, differentiating it from Army qualification. Results showed that CFF should be in ARM, as Soldiers were not prepared in BRM for the additional skills and demands required by CFF. Recommended standards were developed for the Expert, Sharpshooter, Marksman, and Unqualified marksmanship categories, TPU (trained, needs practice, and not trained) categories., and Go/NoGo categories.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 2010
Accession Number
ADA523973

Entities

People

  • David R. James
  • Jean L. Dyer
  • Martin L. Bink
  • Michael D. Dlubac
  • Peter S. Schaefer
  • Richard L. Wampler

Organizations

  • Northrop Grumman

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Afghanistan Conflict
  • Ammunition
  • Army
  • Computers
  • Descriptive Analytics
  • Firing Tables
  • Fungi
  • Iraqi-War
  • Malfunctions
  • Periodicals
  • Ratings
  • Social Sciences
  • Standards
  • Statistics
  • Surveys
  • Training
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Astronomy/Astrophysics
  • Marksmanship and Weaponry.
  • Military Science