Unintended Consequences of the Goldwater-Nichols Act (Joint Force Quarterly, Spring 1998)

Abstract

The tenth anniversary of the Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986 focused attention largely on that law's most apparent and positive aspects. Much good has derived from it. The Nation has enjoyed a string of successes in war and in military operations other than war. The law increased cooperation and interoperability among the services, improved professional military education, and unified the national military command structure. Reforms mandated under Goldwater-Nichols fundamentally altered relationships between the services and joint system and between civilian and military sides of the defense establishment. Some insist the law did not go far enough and they therefore advocate additional reforms. In certain respects they may be correct. However, in one area the reforms may have already gone too far. As we advance into the second decade of the Goldwater-Nichols era and consider what further changes in defense organization are needed, we must be careful not to upset the delicate balance implicit in civilian control of the military.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1998
Accession Number
ADA525942

Entities

People

  • Christopher M. Bourne

Organizations

  • National Defense University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aerial Warfare
  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Congress
  • Department Of Defense
  • Education
  • Governments
  • Law
  • Military Education
  • Military Operations
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Political Systems
  • Security
  • United States
  • Vietnam War

Readers

  • Educational Psychology
  • Government and Public Administration Law.
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.