Strategic Warning: If Surprise is Inevitable, What Role for Analysis?

Abstract

The dramatic events of 11 September 2001 color this paper, but it is not about the devastating terrorist attacks per se, nor about the daunting challenges of tactical warning. The focus, instead, is on strategic warning. Warning analysis is charged with applying all-source information, expert insights, and specialized tradecraft to help policy officials prevent or limit damage from threats to US security interests. Tactical warning, as defined in this paper, seeks to detect and deter specific threats to US interests; the objective is to avoid incident surprise and thus block or blunt damage. Strategic warning addresses perceived dangers in broader terms, in order to inform policymaker decisions on general security preparedness--again to prevent or limit damage. US national security resources are limited. Tactical warning cannot be counted on to pinpoint defensive measures by providing timely notice of all specific attacks and menacing developments. In this context, the challenge of strategic warning is to help policy officials decide--in advance of specific indicators of danger--which of the many plausible general threats to US security interests deserve concerted defensive and preemptive preparations. Strategic warning, to be effective, has to be credible in assessing contingent dangers and has to facilitate policymaker decision and action to protect against these dangers. This paper tables for consideration and debate several recommendations to advance two goals: (1) To reconstitute strategic warning as a collaborative governmental function by engaging policy officials responsible for effecting defensive measures in every step of the analysis process, including topic selection and trend monitoring; (2) To warrant a distinctive intelligence contribution to a collaborative warning effort by expanding dedicated analytic resources and sharpening requisite substantive expertise and specialized tradecraft.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2003
Accession Number
ADA526588

Entities

People

  • Jack Davis

Organizations

  • Central Intelligence Agency

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Human Systems
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Analysts
  • Cold War
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Doctrine
  • Families (Human)
  • Governments
  • Intelligence Analysis
  • Intelligence Analysts
  • Intelligence Community
  • Judgment
  • National Security
  • Security
  • Strategic Warning
  • Tactical Warning
  • Terrorists
  • United States
  • Warning Systems

Readers

  • Emergency Management and Homeland Security.
  • Geospatial Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence Analytics
  • Systems Analysis and Design