The European Union and the Comprehensive Civil-Military Approach in Euro-Atlantic Security: Matching Reality to Rhetoric

Abstract

When the European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) was founded just over a decade ago, it was to be one of the crown jewels in the European Union's emergence as a new, soft civilian-superpower. The ESDP was erected on the premise that the future security environment will be defined less by traditional, state-centric military threats and more by a wide range of diverse challenges that are transnational and complex in nature, and that such complex challenges will require the comprehensive integration of a range of civilian and military capabilities. This comprehensive approach would mean that future success would depend not just on a state's ability to wield military power but its ability to employ and leverage state and nonstate civilian power as well, including "the political, security, development, rule of law, human rights, and humanitarian dimensions of international missions." Ten years into this effort, progress has failed to live up to expectations. The civil-military integration hoped for at the outset has been plagued by an ESDP institutional design that has served to separate and isolate the military and civilian aspects rather than integrate them. Moreover, the vision of building the ESDP into a vehicle for EU civilian power has been plagued by chronic civilian capacity shortfalls, both in the planning and control structures of the ESDP itself and in the ability to deploy civilian experts in an operational capacity. Most problematic, however, is that rather than seize the opportunity to forge the ESDP as an integrative transatlantic and global leader in civilian aspects of security, it has maintained a primarily insular focus on iterative institutional reforms and a series of small-step, functionally circumscribed security missions. If the ESDP is to fulfill the EU's hope of becoming a more significant force for security and stability in the world, the EU must move beyond the insular focus on institutional design that has defined its first decade.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2010
Accession Number
ADA528034

Entities

People

  • Darrell Driver

Organizations

  • Johns Hopkins University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Crisis Management
  • European Union
  • Foreign Policy
  • Foreign Relations
  • Governments
  • Intergovernmental Organizations
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • Military Operations
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Nato
  • Organizational Structure
  • Public Policy
  • Security
  • Treaties
  • United States

Readers

  • International Relations and European Studies
  • Political Violence and Terrorism Studies.
  • Systems Analysis and Design