Metacognitive Awareness versus Linguistic Politeness: Expressions of Confusion in Tutorial Dialogues

Abstract

Research suggests that students who are aware of their own confusions and take steps to resolve those confusions are most likely to benefit from a learning experience. At the same time, there are conversational maxims, such as Leech's politeness maxims, that may inhibit a student from expressing and pursuing confusions within a tutorial dialogue. We investigated students' expressions of confusion while working through a series of learning activities with a tutor. We found that, during the times when students were working independently on an activity, their expressions of confusion were reliable indicators of their (lack of) understanding however, when they were conversing with their tutors, these same students did not express confusion and, in fact, the more often the expressed comprehension, the worse they performed on the post-test. This suggests that student metacognitive statements should not be interpreted without taking into consideration the context in which they were expressed. We briefly consider implications for human tutors and the development of computer tutoring systems.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2009
Accession Number
ADA530033

Entities

People

  • Charles B. Callaway
  • Elaine Farrow
  • Gwendolyn E. Campbell
  • Johanna D. Moore
  • Myroslava Dzikovska
  • Natalie B. Steinhauser

Organizations

  • Naval Air Warfare Center

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aerial Warfare
  • Cognitive Science
  • Comprehension
  • Computer Programming
  • Computers
  • Curriculum
  • Environment
  • High Reliability
  • Information Operations
  • Learning
  • Military Research
  • Neurobehavioral Manifestations
  • Simulations
  • Simulators
  • Standards
  • Students
  • United Kingdom

Fields of Study

  • Education

Readers

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • STEM Education