Setting Military Compensation: Pay Comparisons and Other Approaches

Abstract

Mr. Chairman, I appreciate the opportunity to testify on military compensation issues. At your request, my testimony begins by comparing the pay of military personnel and federal civilians. That analysis suggests that, at pay grades compared in a Defense Department study, military personnel have higher take-home pay than federal civilians. Because of the many limitations on these comparisons, however, they should at most be used as one guide to deciding military compensation issues. Decisions should be based primarily on the ability of the military to recruit and retain the personnel that it needs. In recent years, recruiting and retention have been at or near historically high levels in all the services. CBO expects that recruiting and retention will continue to be very good for the next few years. In light of these results and the need for fiscal restraint, the Congress may explore alternative approaches to limit the growth in military compensation. My testimony concludes by discussing two such approaches: limits on pay raises and changes in military retirement.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Nov 30, 1983
Accession Number
ADA530714

Entities

People

  • Robert F. Hale

Organizations

  • Congressional Budget Office

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Benefits
  • Business Administration
  • Civilian Personnel
  • Compensation
  • Department Of Defense
  • Enlisted Personnel
  • Fringe Benefits
  • Income
  • Management Personnel
  • Manpower
  • Military Budgets
  • Military Personnel
  • Organizational Structure
  • Personnel Management
  • Recruiting
  • Recruits

Readers

  • Economics
  • Military Mobilization and Reserve Forces Studies.