Past Base Closures and Realignments: Costs and Savings

Abstract

In May 1988, the Secretary of Defense established the Commission on Base Realignment and Closure to recommend specific actions to achieve a more efficient military base structure. The commission's final recommendations, if authorized by the Congress, would affect 145 military installations. Of these, 86 would be closed entirely, 5 would be closed partially, and 54 would be realigned. According to the commission, these closures and realignments will result in the reduction of 12,889 military and 7,748 civilian jobs and will eventually save $693.6 million annually in base operating costs. Even after deducting the one-time costs associated with closing bases, the net present value of savings over 20 years will total $5.6 billion. To provide perspective on these projected savings, this report estimates the costs and savings associated with selected base closures and realignments that occurred during the 1970s. It focuses on nine bases for which adequate data were available to estimate both the recurring annual savings and the one-time net costs involved with closure or realignment. This report also discusses three potential issues raised by the analysis and directly related to the commission's recommendations. These include the effect of closures and realignments on the budget deficit, the problem of defining one-time costs and savings, and the method of specifying the payback period.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 01, 1989
Accession Number
ADA530806

Entities

People

  • Wayne Glass

Organizations

  • Congressional Budget Office

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Force Facilities
  • Base Closures
  • Budgets
  • Civilian Personnel
  • Congress
  • Department Of Defense
  • Environmental Restoration And Remediation
  • Federal Budgets
  • Force Structure
  • Governments
  • Law
  • Military Budgets
  • Military Personnel
  • National Governments
  • National Security
  • United States

Readers

  • Energy Conservation and Renewable Energy Engineering.
  • Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of Proposed Air Force Base Actions.
  • Public Financial Management and Budgeting