A Space Acquisition Leading Indicator Based on System Interoperation Maturity

Abstract

The Department of Defense's space acquisition enterprise has experienced numerous challenges since the advent of space power. Space borne capabilities are needed more than ever, but space acquisition frequently fails to meet its goals. The decades of space acquisition experience form a rich history that can be used to build a leading indicator of success to enable effective program execution. First, the space acquisition areas of greatest concern were determined to be cost, schedule and requirements. These areas are considered as systems composed of the people, processes and products that execute the program. Second, the vital interoperation characteristics, or attributes that each system must possess to be successful, can be extracted from past space acquisition lessons learned and placed into an interoperability maturity model. The maturity model can then be used to capture the relative maturity of the program's major systems and their ability to interoperate within the context of each critical characteristic. Third, the maturity model forms the basis for an interoperability measurement using the method developed by Dr. Thomas Ford, where higher levels of interoperability maturity will result in a higher interoperability score. The process is demonstrated with three recent space programs with interpretive analysis provided.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 2010
Accession Number
ADA533903

Entities

People

  • Jason T. Shibata

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Air Force
  • Artificial Satellites
  • Geosynchronous Orbits
  • Geosynchronous Satellites
  • Information Systems
  • Lessons Learned
  • Literature Surveys
  • Organizational Structure
  • Reconnaissance Satellites
  • Software Design
  • Software Development
  • Space Systems
  • System Software
  • Systems Engineering
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Defense Acquisition Program Management
  • Enterprise Information Systems Architecture and Joint Command Capability Interoperability Support.
  • Systems Analysis and Design

Technology Areas

  • Space