Conventional Arms Control and American Policy in the 21st Century

Abstract

Thucydides noted in his history of the Peloponnesian Wars that one of the primary motivators of Athenian foreign policy was -niterests."1 This remains as true in the 21st century as in ancient Greece. As a result modern policymakers would all agree that the national strategy of any country must be consistent with national interests and built on three variables. First, what are the "ends" of strategy or the goals the nation is trying to accomplish alone or in concert with friends and allies? Second, what are the "ways" or policies that are formulated in order to move the nation in the direction of a better future? Finally, what are the "means" or resources available to the government of any nation that can be devoted to securing these objectives, and how can they be husbanded in a fashion to maximize their potential?

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 01, 2010
Accession Number
ADA535747

Entities

People

  • Jeffrey D. Mccausland Jr.

Organizations

  • United States Air Force Academy

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Biomedical
  • Counter WMD
  • Human Systems
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aircrafts
  • Anti-Personnel Mines
  • Arms Control
  • Arms Control Treaties
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Geography
  • International Law
  • International Relations
  • Lessons Learned
  • Military Science
  • Military Training
  • National Security
  • Strategic Weapons
  • Terrorism
  • Treaties
  • Ussr
  • Warfare

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • East Asian Political and Security Studies within the Soviet Union
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Systems Analysis and Design