A Primer on Developing Measures of Effectiveness

Abstract

To understand the operational level of war, students must appreciate the newest Joint doctrine. At the Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, an important doctrinal concept is elements of operational design. As an instructor at the college, I have observed that "measures of effectiveness" are a difficult aspect of operational design for students to understand. Because my own knowledge of the concept was lacking, I conducted some research on the topic by scanning existing Joint doctrine and asking around the school. My only success came from individuals at the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center, who provided a NATO manual on best practices for assessing command and control systems. This manual is informative about measures of effectiveness, albeit not in the context of operational design, and it is too technical and specialized for most staff officers. The dearth of knowledge surrounding measures of effectiveness extends beyond the college student population. This conclusion is not meant to disparage anyone or any institution but to highlight the general lack of understanding surrounding the concept of measures of effectiveness. This article reflects my efforts to describe a practical but rigorous method to develop measures of effectiveness that a nonspecialist can employ. The article will cover- (1) Examining the utility of metrics in general; (2) Analyzing how current Joint doctrine portrays measures of effectiveness as part of the elements of operational design; (3) Exploring how fields outside the military deal with concepts like measures of effectiveness; (4) Mining those other fields for insights to help bridge some of the gaps in current military doctrine; and (5) Providing observations on the implications of my findings on the emerging Army doctrine of design and related concepts.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Aug 01, 2010
Accession Number
ADA536572

Entities

People

  • Shon Mccormick

Organizations

  • United States Army Combined Arms Center

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Best Practices
  • Command And Control
  • Command And Control Systems
  • Doctrine
  • Governments
  • Measurement
  • Measures Of Effectiveness
  • Military Doctrine
  • Military Planning
  • Operations Research
  • Public Policy
  • Security
  • Social Sciences
  • Stability Operations
  • Statistical Analysis
  • United States

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Military Training and Readiness Simulation
  • Systems Analysis and Design

Technology Areas

  • Fully Networked C3
  • Fully Networked C3 - Command and Control