Upgrading the Extender: Which Options Are Cost-Effective for Modernizing the KC-10
Abstract
The Air Force asked RAND Project AIR FORCE to undertake a study to provide objective insight into the cost-effectiveness of modernizing the KC-10 "Extender" air refueling (AR) tanker aircraft. The study analyzed the cost-effectiveness of modernizing the KC-10 in the areas of avionics (CNS capabilities for ATM), NVIS compatibility, C2 (specifically, tactical data-link [TDL] capability), additional multipoint refueling capability, defensive protection, and reliability and safety upgrades. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of the various modernization options by estimating each option's total life-cycle cost and comparing that cost with its quantitative benefit. The quantitative benefit of each option was determined by valuing the number of tanker aircraft saved because of the KC-10's increased wartime mission effectiveness and the effects on peacetime operating costs after modernization. In some cases, modernization options provide benefits that do not directly affect the cost or effectiveness of the KC-10 but, rather, improve commanders' operational flexibility in employing the KC-10 or improve the effectiveness of other weapon systems. In such cases, we highlight these additional benefits or implications.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Jan 01, 2011
- Accession Number
- ADA537518
Entities
People
- Anthony D. Rosello
- Chuck Stelzer
- David T. Orletsky
- Fred Timson
- Katherine M. Calef
- Michael Kennedy
- Sean Bednarz
Organizations
- RAND Corporation