A Unified Field Theory of Coercive Airpower

Abstract

Airpower is neither inherently strategic nor tactical in nature, but it is inherently flexible. This is the key to coercing our enemies through airpower, and failure to recognize this fundamental truth has led many airpower theorists astray. Airpower is but one of the tools available to the military commander, and that tool may be applied in different ways at several different levels of war. To proclaim that a single approach against a certain target set will always succeed, ignores the fact that circumstances surrounding different conflicts can be vastly dissimilar. This article shows the linkages between the various accepted types of coercive strategy and the ways they are more described as points along a single continuum of military options rather than as separate, isolated strategies. The decision as to which portion of that continuum to employ-and at what level of war-can be made only after examining the context within which a particular conflict exists.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 01, 1997
Accession Number
ADA541823

Entities

People

  • Scott Walker

Organizations

  • Air University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • C4I
  • Counter IED
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aerial Warfare
  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Bombing
  • Bombs
  • Center Of Gravity
  • Doctrine
  • Ground Support
  • Guided Bombs
  • Information Operations
  • Military Force Levels
  • Military Organizations
  • Tactical Air Support
  • United States
  • War
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Strategic Security Studies
  • Theoretical Analysis.