Establishing an Intellectual and Theoretical Foundation for the After Action Review Process - A Literature Review
Abstract
The purpose of this report is to provide a literature review of the cognitive and learning science research that is relevant to defining an effective after action review (AAR) process. The goal of this review is to assemble research sources that apply to the design and conduct of after action reviews. Therefore, this report provides a synopsis of research that exists, identifies notable researchers who have addressed the problem, presents results of both military and non-military investigations or implementations of the AAR technique, highlights existing theories that may contribute to the advancement of AARs, and isolates specific areas that demand further work. The findings are a distillation of what is known about the AAR process. As such, they would be of interest to researchers who wish to acquire or update their knowledge of the area. The findings would also be of interest to those who train AAR facilitators as a comprehensive foundation of AAR research.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Apr 01, 2011
- Accession Number
- ADA543054
Entities
People
- James P. Bliss
- Jeffrey Wilkinson
- John S. Barnett
- Steven A. Minnis
- Thomas Mastaglio
Organizations
- U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences