Brigade Combat Teams: Designed to Design

Abstract

Should the U.S. Army allocate an Advanced Military Studies Program (AMSP) graduate to the Brigade Combat Team's plans cell in light of a decade of doctrinal changes and modularity? This monograph analyzes a decade's worth of change in the U.S. Army, post September 11, 2001. Ten years of combat operations and Army modularity has not only changed the way the Army fights, but how it must think. This monograph presents four recommendations for the Army to consider to close the operational planning gap in the BCT plans cell: (1) expand the AMSP to provide one operational planner per BCT, (2) reallocate the current annual AMPS graduates to provide one per BCT, (3) incorporate the Army's design methodology instruction into the Command and General Staff School curriculum, and (4) provide an operational planners course mobile training team to deploying BCTs.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 19, 2011
Accession Number
ADA546319

Entities

People

  • John A. Kelly

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Cyber
  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Army Personnel
  • Artillery
  • Combat Operations
  • Doctrine
  • Employment
  • Humanitarian Assistance
  • Information Systems
  • Iraqi-War
  • Military History
  • Military Operations
  • Military Science
  • Personnel Management
  • Students
  • Training
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • STEM Education
  • Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Autonomous Capabilities and Mission Reconnaissance.