Is Major Conflict a Thing of the Past?
Abstract
The United Kingdom Strategic Defense and Security Review published its findings on 20 October 2010. The central tenet of this review is that hybrid conflict, as seen most recently in Iraq and Afghanistan, is the dominant feature of warfare in the twenty-first century. Speeches by senior British politicians and military leaders indicate that their vision for the future may be either misinformed or driven by economic factors rather than a comprehensive assessment of the future operating environment. With future force structures, organization and equipment procurement programs dependent on this vision, it is essential that they are based on the correct assumptions. A review of the world history would suggest that major state-on-state warfare has not become completely a thing of the past. The potential shift in the balance of power between the United States and China might prove to be the catalyst to global-scale instability. When combined with global trends and historical flash points, they have the potential to create the strategic shock that could precipitate great power state-on-state conflict. The United Kingdom therefore needs to reconsider its grand strategy for the twenty-first century and structure its armed forces for major combat operations.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Mar 08, 2011
- Accession Number
- ADA547376
Entities
People
- James J. Learmont
Organizations
- United States Army War College