What Barriers Prevent ICME from Becoming Part of the Designer's Tollbox? (Preprint)

Abstract

Integrated computational materials engineering methodologies promise a revolutionary step forward in the qualification, certification, and sustainment of Air Force systems via reduction of the historically slow and costly materials data development footprint [1,2,3]. The establishment of scientifically-based, statistically-robust processes by which computational materials models can be quantitatively graded, accepted and utilized by the aerospace structures design, manufacture, and sustainment communities for cost and time savings presents a major hurdle towards the realization of the potential of ICME. To allow for the change to the materials qualification paradigm offered by ICME, several barriers (economic, cultural, and technical) must be overcome. Via identification and discussion of these issues, this article challenges the ICME community to position itself for success via integration with the industrial structural design community.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 01, 2011
Accession Number
ADA553284

Entities

People

  • P. L. Ret

Organizations

  • Air Force Research Laboratory

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Air Force
  • Air Force Facilities
  • Air Force Research Laboratories
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Chemistry
  • Communities
  • Computational Modeling
  • Engineering
  • Engineers
  • Integrated Computational Materials Engineering
  • Materials
  • Materials Engineering
  • Materials Science
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Three Dimensional
  • United States

Readers

  • Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
  • Organizational Process Management (OPM).
  • Systems Analysis and Design

Technology Areas

  • Space