Accuracy and Best Practices for Small-Scale Rocket Engine Testing

Abstract

An in-depth analysis of the uncertainties associated with small-scale rocket engine testing has been conducted. The analysis uses terminology and approaches detailed in the ISO 'Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement' (GUM) and a recent NASA handbook on the subject (NASA HBK-8739.19-3). Along with this analysis, best practices for minimizing uncertainties are provided. AFRL's Experimental Cell-1 facility is used as the example engine, and the data values provided come from this system. The facility is sized to test a single, full-scale element or an array of scaled-down elements producing thrust in the range of 100-500 pounds. The facility has recently completed an overhaul to increase the number of data channels available and to improve accuracy. The measurand being specifically evaluated is c*-efficiency (eta(c*)). However, details are given on all of the parameters which contribute to the measurement and calculation of this value. This analysis should aid in the design, upgrade, operation and data assessment of EC-1 and other small-scale facilities.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Nov 10, 2011
Accession Number
ADA555453

Entities

People

  • Jon Watts
  • Malissa Lightfoot
  • Stephen A. Danczyk
  • Stephen Alexander Schumaker

Organizations

  • Air Force Research Laboratory

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Air Force Research Laboratories
  • Best Practices
  • Coefficients
  • Engines
  • Flow
  • Flow Rate
  • Gas Flow
  • Junction Boxes
  • Mass Flow
  • Measurement
  • Rocket Engines
  • Rockets
  • Test Facilities
  • Transducers
  • Uncertainty
  • Vapor Pressure

Fields of Study

  • Physics

Readers

  • Aerospace Test and Evaluation
  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Systems Analysis and Design