Comparing the Efficacy of Airpower and Heavy Ground Power
Abstract
America's current financial strains necessitate an investigation into the effectiveness and efficiency of our fighting forces. This monograph explores the history of technology, theory, and doctrine in heavy ground combat power and air power to determine whether one force component is more efficient and effective than the other. The author first constructs a model to compare and contrast the characteristics, functions, roles, and missions associated with each force component. Next, he explains the concepts of effectiveness, efficiency, and efficacy, and highlights the importance of economy of force. Then he applies the model to Operation Desert Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom to identify specific examples of effectiveness and efficiency by the two force components during these military operations. The analysis reveals that it is impossible and unnecessary to compare the efficacy of heavy ground power versus air power. Rather, operational planners should understand the conditions that promote efficacy in each force component, and then employ those conditions to bring out each force component's strengths. This methodology will ensure that each force component is employed in the most effective and efficient way possible.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Dec 01, 2011
- Accession Number
- ADA557911
Entities
People
- Andrew C. Caggiano
Organizations
- United States Army Command and General Staff College