Adapting the Army: Institutionalizing Counter-IED Training Efforts

Abstract

The success of U.S. forces during the early phases of combat in Afghanistan and Iraq provides testimony to the competence of American Soldiers, the superiority of their equipment, and the exceptional quality of their training. However, after the conclusion of conventional combat operations, our Soldiers faced a resilient and adaptive enemy bent on continuing the fight and hindering any transition to peace, democracy, and public order. To do this, our enemy had to change the conditions of the battle and nullify or defeat elements that gave us superiority. For instance, to defeat our long-range weapons and standoff capabilities, he hid among the populace and attacked us at close quarters. He avoided force-on-force combat by employing improvised explosive devices (IEDs) plus hit-and-run tactics against convoys and units to inflict casualties. He buried explosives to attack our vehicles from beneath and attempted to emplace explosively formed penetrators to defeat U.S. detection and neutralization systems.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 2010
Accession Number
ADA560120

Entities

People

  • Dorian D'aria
  • Tahnee L. Moore

Organizations

  • United States Army Engineer School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter IED
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Army Training
  • Asymmetric Warfare
  • Databases
  • Doctrine
  • Education
  • Explosive Devices
  • Explosives
  • Improvised Explosive Devices
  • Military Education
  • Military Science
  • Military Training
  • Students
  • Training
  • Training Management
  • United States
  • United States Central Command
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Munitions and Ordnance Engineering