Acquisition Reform: Does MRAP Provide a Model?

Abstract

Nine years of persistent engagement of our Joint Forces in Iraq and Afghanistan has made demands on the Defense Acquisition System to become more agile and responsive in providing capabilities to the field to satisfy urgent operational needs. An examination of programs ranging from body armor, Improvised Explosive Device Jammers, armored tactical wheeled vehicles, route clearance equipment, and other rapid program initiatives results in data that demonstrate acquisition teams performing herculean tasks to get capability to the field quickly. The most significant program in terms of speed, complexity, and oversight was the procurement of Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles. This research project presents a case study of the Joint MRAP Vehicle Program (JMPV) to further understanding of the program's ability to move as rapidly as it did to fulfill an urgent operational need. The paper attempts to answer the following question: Does MRAP provide a model for Acquisition Reform? If not, were there any lessons learned from the JMVP that are applicable to Acquisition Reform? This research will examine MRAP's journey from the factory to the battlefield and how the JMVP was able to produce, configure, field, and sustain the over 26,882 MRAP vehicles that are currently in use in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 21, 2011
Accession Number
ADA560190

Entities

People

  • Kevin B. Peterson

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Counter IED
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Case Studies
  • Explosive Devices
  • Improvised Explosive Devices
  • Lessons Learned
  • Logistics
  • Military Acquisition
  • Military Science
  • Procurement
  • Supply Chain
  • Supply Chain Management
  • Test And Evaluation
  • United States
  • United States Central Command
  • United States Transportation Command
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Civilian Systems Systems Program Capability Development and Upgrade Support Activity Expense and Pay Management.
  • Military Logistics and Supply Chain Management
  • Strategic Security Studies