Nuclear Deterrence: Strong Policy is Needed for Effective Defense

Abstract

Nuclear arms are incredibly powerful weapons capable of deterring attack, assuring friends, and dissuading others. Since the Cold War ended, there has been less emphasis on nuclear deterrence in world affairs. However, the current and near-future environment shows a continued need for nuclear deterrence, against both large and small opponents, including rogue states and non-state actors. The current National Security Strategy and Nuclear Posture Review do not provide a position of strength for U.S. defense. The policy of go to zero, inadequate stockpile management, and stating nuclear weapons are for deterrence only do not communicate U.S. resolve to prevent and/or respond to nuclear issues. A stronger policy encompassing meaningful reductions, communicating the right to use a range of capabilities to respond to nuclear threats, and promulgating substantial nuclear modernization will allow the U.S. to proceed from a stalwart posture. This will show other nations the U.S. is more than capable of deterring attack, assuring its friends and dissuading those who seek to obtain nuclear weapons.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 24, 2011
Accession Number
ADA560225

Entities

People

  • Todd J. Schollars

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Arms Control
  • Cold War
  • Foreign Relations
  • Governments
  • Intergovernmental Organizations
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Nato
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Recreation
  • Treaties
  • United States
  • United States Strategic Command
  • War Colleges

Fields of Study

  • Political science

Readers

  • Strategic Security Studies