Toxic Leadership in the Military Profession

Abstract

The military wants to rid its top ranks of toxic leaders. A survey of more than 22,630 leaders from the rank of E-5 through O-6 and Department of Defense (DoD) civilians showed that roughly one in five sees his or her superior as toxic or unethical. As an institution of high ethics and values, DoD must pay particular attention to toxic leadership because of the serious consequences caused by leadership failure. Senior leaders must consider whether minor adjustments are required, or whether the situation necessitates major change to current policies. All services in the military can be dramatically affected by a small number of toxic leaders. In contrast, most strategic leaders are viewed quite positively, as they balance individual subordinate needs with the demands of mission requirements. The one consistent attribute effective leaders have in common is a strong set of core values, including character, ethics, and integrity. Strong leaders use their core values as a set of guiding principles or moral compass. This paper highlights the nature, frequency, severity, and trepidations of toxic leadership in the military, and recommends three strategies for shaping a more positive and effective leadership culture and policy for the future.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 15, 2012
Accession Number
ADA560886

Entities

People

  • John E. Box

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Department Of Defense
  • Doctrine
  • Education
  • Governments
  • Human Resources
  • Instructors
  • Management Personnel
  • Military Operations
  • Military Science
  • Personality
  • Personnel Management
  • Schools
  • Students
  • United States
  • United States Military Academy
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Economics
  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.