The Concept of Design: Are We off Track?
Abstract
This thesis examines design as a methodology for applying critical and creative thinking to further an understanding of interdependent variables seeking an internal and external equilibrium to support decisions based on an assessment of capability and ability within the Joint Operation Planning Process (JOPP). The process of design brings clarity, defines the critical challenges, and builds an analytical bridge between the problem and action. Design is essential, but it is misunderstood. What went wrong in the application of design to military doctrine can be distilled into four major points: (1) Lack of clarity as to where design fits, (2) Confusion of design with the commander's intent and guidance, (3) Mixing of design and mission analysis, and (4) Profusion of terms to replace the original design precepts. To get design back on track, doctrine must define the relationship between design and its linkages in a hierarchical planning structure favored by military services; define where and how design fits in the JOPP (design no longer remains as a separate and distinct process); and define where original design precepts and terms clearly reside.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Technical Report
- Publication Date
- Jun 15, 2012
- Accession Number
- ADA562302
Entities
People
- Thomas B. Gukeisen
Organizations
- National Defense University