Is Back to Basics Logistics Where We Need to Go?

Abstract

The United States Army has been in persistent conflict over the last ten years since the announcement of the Transformation and the introduction of Joint Vision 2020, which called for a new focused logistics strategy and a reduction in logistics mass. Unfortunately, the transformation in logistics and sustainment for the Army took a back seat to the close fight war effort to ensure the war fighter was well resourced and sustained. Now with the war in Iraq winding down and the war in Afghanistan heading in the same direction, the cry in garrison is for units to get back to basics . Years of overly healthy stocks, excess equipment in theater, and a war resourcing mentality has given rise to a culture of leaders and Soldiers who have never been without. This cry for back to basics is coming from the highest level of leadership in many different war fighting functions, and sustainment is no exception. But is it wise to preach a back to basics message to a force that has no idea what that means? Or should the message capitalize on the talent and experience troops have gained in ten years at war.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 22, 2012
Accession Number
ADA563379

Entities

People

  • Tammie J. Pettit

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Afghanistan Conflict
  • Aircrafts
  • Business Administration
  • Civil War
  • Deployment
  • Logistics
  • Maintenance
  • Military Equipment
  • Military History
  • Military Science
  • Organizational Structure
  • Supply Chain
  • Supply Chain Management
  • Test And Evaluation
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Logistics and Supply Chain Management.
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.