Security Force Assistance and the Brigade Combat Team: Recommendations for the Way Ahead

Abstract

The U.S. Army is in the process of making choices regarding how to efficiently provide a wide array of options to the U.S. President for dealing with current and future security concerns. A key issue related to this choice concerns the method used to establish and maintain a Security Force Assistance (or train, advise, and assist) capability in Army General Purpose Forces. The focus of this research is to answer the following question: Do modular Brigade Combat Teams (BCTs) and the supporting force structure have the capability to effectively cover the full spectrum of operations, specifically SFA missions, in both Phase IV (Stabilize) and Phase 0 (Shape) environments? The answer to the primary question indicates that a BCT, with augmentation, can be effective in conducting SFA missions in Phase IV (Stabilize) environments. However, unless the Army is willing to change its culture and adopt certain recommendations, significant challenges to effectively accomplishing SFA missions in Phase 0 (Shape) environments using the BCT approach are likely to be encountered.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 10, 2011
Accession Number
ADA565248

Entities

People

  • Gary A. Rosenberg

Organizations

  • George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Asymmetric Warfare
  • Combat Operations
  • Combatant Commanders
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Doctrine
  • Intergovernmental Organizations
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • Military Education
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Recreation
  • Students
  • Unified Combatant Commands
  • United States European Command
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Maritime Combat Support and Expeditionary Logistics.
  • Strategic Security Studies