Choosing Defense Project Portfolios: A New Tool for Making Optimal Choices in a World of Constraint and Uncertainty

Abstract

The U.S. Budget Control Act of 2011 presents the U.S. Army and the rest of the Department of Defense (DoD) with unprecedented fiscal challenges. Austerity will be the watchword, while the need for mission-capable weapon systems will continue. Army and other DoD decision makers thus face increased urgency in their attempts to reap savings through improved efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Among those attempts, they will have to follow a 2006 directive from the Deputy Secretary of Defense that all DoD agencies use capability portfolio management to optimize investments and minimize risk in meeting needs across the defense enterprise. With these needs and guidance in mind, the RAND Arroyo Center in 2006 began developing a methodology for selecting and managing portfolios of projects in the acquisition process. The application of PortMan, RAND's new portfolio analysis and management methodology, enables finding the optimal portfolio of projects out of billions or trillions of possibilities. The optimal portfolio here is the one that maximizes the probability of filling a desired set of requirements while restraining costs. Using PortMan, decision makers can also identify the optimal total remaining life cycle budget to complete the science and technology (S&T) activities for the optimal portfolio and to develop and field their future systems. Further, PortMan provides the optimal budget split between S&T and system implementation.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2012
Accession Number
ADA565670

Entities

People

  • James Chiesa

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Army Training
  • Corporations
  • Cost Effectiveness
  • Costs
  • Defense Systems
  • Department Of Defense
  • Education
  • Engineering
  • Health Care
  • Homeland Security
  • Intellectual Property
  • Law
  • National Security
  • Security
  • Uncertainty
  • Weapon Systems

Readers

  • Defense Acquisition Program Management
  • Economics