Assessment: Give Me a Place to Stand, and I Will Move the Earth

Abstract

The fundamental challenge of C2 agility is to increase the rationality of operations. An important vehicle for doing so is by increasing the rationality of assessment, from seeing rationality as a mere matter of "facts" and "objective analysis", to seeing rationality as a function of human cognition in relation to the structures of the environment. At the heart of C2 lies the problem of dealing with uncertainty, a problem that can to some extent be addressed by making assessments. Assessments however, cannot provide all the answers and expectations on assessment are in many cases unrealistic. The idea of armed conflict as a linear and predictable engineering problem has long been abandoned (if ever accepted at all). Planning and assessment however, are still conducted in a way resembling engineering. Planning is essentially a matter of choosing between alternatives and assessment is often described in terms of "objective analysis" of "facts". Based on Herbert Simon's notion of bounded rationality we will in this paper offer an alternative view on rationality and show how a shift of paradigm and an altered approach to uncertainty can in fact increase agility in C2.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 2012
Accession Number
ADA569919

Entities

People

  • Erik Bjurstrom
  • Peter Nilsson

Organizations

  • Swedish Defence Research Agency

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Ambiguity
  • Cognition
  • Engineering
  • Environment
  • Errors
  • Human Intelligence
  • Information Processing
  • National Security
  • Pattern Recognition
  • Personality
  • Psychology
  • Social Environment
  • Social Sciences
  • Standards
  • Thinking
  • Uncertainty
  • Universities

Readers

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Systems Analysis and Design