Air Force Command and Control: The Need for Increased Adaptability

Abstract

This paper captures the results of a CSAF directed study on USAF command and control (C2). The study examined Air Force C2 in seven cases covering the spectrum of conflict to determine whether doctrine and organizational structures require change to fit uncertain and dynamic future scenarios. A modified version of the Alberts and Hayes C2 approach space construct was used for the analysis. The study's results showed that USAF C2 design must change in order to increase its adaptability. An overall goal for adaptive C2 design is offered along with six key variables to consider. The study's concluding analysis identifies three overarching problems the USAF must overcome to attain an adaptive C2 structure: lack of clarity among command relationships, lack of confidence and trust, and lack of capability and capacity regarding USAF integration elements. Several recommendations are presented that address these issues. The recommendations include: the need to broaden the understanding of Air Force personnel on the very concept of centralized control as well as improve their comprehension of command relationships--especially support. Also, the Air Force must organize, train, and equip for organizational structures that produce C2 elements at appropriate organizational echelons. Finally, the service should create a force-development strategy for subtheater commanders.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 2012
Accession Number
ADA570197

Entities

People

  • Jeffrey B. Hukill

Organizations

  • Air University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Cyber
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Afghanistan Conflict
  • Air Force
  • Air Force Personnel
  • Combat Operations
  • Combatant Commanders
  • Command And Control
  • Command And Control Systems
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Doctrine
  • Iraqi-War
  • Lessons Learned
  • Military Operations
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • Organizational Structure
  • Unified Combatant Commands
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Aerospace logistics and air mobility.
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Systems Analysis and Design

Technology Areas

  • Fully Networked C3
  • Fully Networked C3 - Command and Control
  • Space