Developing Trustworthy Commissioned Officers: Transcending the Honor Codes and Concept

Abstract

Our nation's three primary means of providing the Armed Forces with commissioned officers are: Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC), Officer Candidate Schools (OCS), and the Federal Service Academies. Each of these sources are duty bound to commission leaders of character, entrusted with leading America's Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen. The importance of commissioning leaders of character is uncontested, even axiomatic; but what is required and expected of a leader of character can be a source of debate. Our aim is to clarify what it means to be a leader of character and to recommend a holistic approach to developing such leaders in each of our sources of commission (SOC). To begin, it is essential to define and understand character. Next, we must determine a theoretical or empirical method by which character may be developed. Third, tangible activities within the developmental programs at each SOC must be designed and implemented, accordingly. Finally, we must gain consensus on what are expected as observable, measureable outcomes attributable to the developmental process.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 01, 2012
Accession Number
ADA573152

Entities

People

  • David B. Cushen
  • Joseph P. Doty
  • Patrick A. Toffler

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Education
  • History
  • Instructions
  • Leadership
  • Military Education
  • Military Psychology
  • Military Science
  • Psychological Phenomena And Processes
  • Psychology
  • Schools
  • Service Academies
  • Social Psychology
  • Students
  • Training
  • United States
  • United States Military Academy

Readers

  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.
  • Strategic Security Studies
  • Systems Analysis and Design