Comparison of Three Roughness Function Determination Methods

Abstract

Three methods have been used to experimentally determine the roughness function (DU+) for several rough surfaces. These include the rotating disk, the towed plate, and the velocity profile methods. The first two are indirect methods in as much as they rely on measurements of overall torque or resistance and boundary layer similarity laws to obtain DU+, whereas the velocity profile method provides a direct measurement of DU+. The present results indicate good agreement between the towed plate and the velocity profile methods for all of the surfaces tested. Tests for the rotating disk were carried out at much higher unit Reynolds numbers. Using this method, the results for sandpaper rough surfaces agree within their uncertainty with a Nikuradse-type roughness function in the fully rough regime, while a spray painted surface agrees with a Colebrook-type roughness function.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Aug 23, 2003
Accession Number
ADA573946

Entities

People

  • A. Myers
  • Michael P. Schultz

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Agreements
  • Boundaries
  • Boundary Layer
  • Confidence Limits
  • Layers
  • Measurement
  • Pressure Gradients
  • Resistance
  • Reynolds Number
  • Roughness
  • Surface Properties
  • Surface Roughness
  • Test Facilities
  • Test Fixtures
  • Turbulent Boundary Layer
  • Uncertainty
  • United States Naval Academy

Readers

  • Electromagnetic Wave Scattering and Antenna Radiation Engineering
  • Fluid Dynamics.
  • Marine Hydrodynamics