Negating compound sentences

Abstract

How do reasoners negate compound sentences, such as conjunctions of the form A and B and disjunctions of the form A or B or both? A theory based on mental models posits that reasoners negate each clause independently, and enumerate the various possibilities consistent with the negation. It makes a novel prediction: negations of conjunctions should be more difficult to comprehend than negations of disjunctions. Two experiments corroborate the prediction. Experiment 1 tested participants' ability to comprehend sentential negations by giving them assertions of the form: Bob denied that he wore a yellow shirt and he wore blue pants on Tuesday. Participants selected the clothing options that Bob possibly wore on Tuesday. Experiment 2 gave participants descriptions such as Bob loves Mary or Mary loves John or both, and they were required to formulate a denial by completing a sentence that started with "No, ". In both studies, participants' responses were more accurate for denials of disjunctions than denials of conjunctions.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Aug 01, 2012
Accession Number
ADA577259

Entities

People

  • Isabel Orenes
  • P. N. Johnson-laird
  • Sangeet Khemlani

Organizations

  • United States Naval Research Laboratory

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognition
  • Cognitive Science
  • Complex Compounds
  • Contrast
  • Information Operations
  • Language
  • Linguistics
  • Litmus Tests
  • Materials
  • Military Research
  • Model Theory
  • Models
  • Natural Languages
  • Psychology
  • Reasoning

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Computational Linguistics
  • Military History
  • Systems Analysis and Design